A great deal has been written since time immemorial about reading and studying and creating works literature, and the experiential relationship with this form of art. For many, literature became a focal point of their existence and their writings influenced the way of thinking and stance in life of others. What Stalin had precisely in mind when he said that writers and poets are ‘the engineers of the human soul’, but we do not need a Stalinist buzzword to remind me that reading works of literature profoundly affects soul and mind, generates and shapes emotions, forms thoughts, ideas, and articulates speech, the prerequisites to will and action, and the bond of man with the world. I realized early in life the emotional touch books could have on the soul, how my connection with literature shaped and matured the inner world of ideas, feeling and emotions, how it developed my perception of reality and enhanced self-awareness, helped me to formulate thoughts and ideas, and eventually gave rise to a need to express this inner world of mine with words and, when possible and applicable, with actions.
Literary
works of Greek writers of the last century, virtually unknown outside the
narrow confines of the Greek literary world and society, Papadiamantis,
Karagatsis, Myrivilis, Venezis, Delta, Theotokas and others, whose works excerpts,
however, had prominent places in school textbooks (as deemed suitable by the
ministry for the ethno-religious edification of Greek
children) and, later, Lountemis, Kazantzakis, Varnalis, Sotiriou, Alexiou,
Hatzis, Tsirkas, of Koumandareas,
Themelis, Doukas, most of them of leftist inclinations and whose unconventional
and progressive writing were banished from the mainstream ‘curriculum’ of my
school years, books from both sets of authors adorned the family library. Reading
short stories, novellas and novels in my native language was easy and enjoyable
and I devoured our books one after another, the most intriguing amongst them in
a single day, through incessant and marathon readings that often began in the
quiet, lazy afternoons after lunch when others were enjoying their siestas, and
ended at dusk in the dimmed skylight through my balcony door. No volume and
weight, no number of pages in any book discouraged or intimidated me.
Father's
collection of books unfortunately lacked works of poetry. That might be both
cause and effect of a deficit in sensitivity and romanticism in his personality,
characteristics of poetic souls, as far as I know, which Father neither
inherited from his family environment, nor did he cultivate in his life. As I
grew older, motivated mainly by the revolutionary music we listened to and the
lyrics of songs we sang, I embarked in enriching our library with collections of
poets like Ritsos, Varnalis, Seferis, Livaditis, Kavvadias, Embeirikos,
Karyotakis, from the rich Greek heritage, and of Neruda, Lorca, Mayakovski and
others from the progressive world poetry. Old-school established and mainstream
poets, like Palamas, Solomos, Drosinis, Vizyinos, Kalvos and others, were studied
and their poetry occasionally discussed in class, with indifference it must be
said, while some of their poems were memorized from and recited in front of teachers
and parents in national holidays.
As is well
known, that period of adolescence and early youth, a period of immaturity amongst
other things, opens up in the mind a constantly renewed and expanding range of
ambitions. The readings motivated me to try to write my own prose. And I did
attempt to write, without any particular authenticity in form and creativity in
the content, the harsh truth was, mostly imitating the style and idiomatic
language used, in the natural or authentic forms developed by each seasoned writer
I read. Those diverse style influenced my prose along the way and altering accordingly
my style of writing, as I was reading one’s work with its individual authentic
style, such as women get ideas for their outfit by flipping through fashion
magazines. Timidly, but with furtive hopes of some recognition, I submitted to
a national student competition a short non-fictional story competition story:
about the neighborhood which was enveloping my childhood years, the taverna of Tsapatsaraina
by the stream where common folk gathered on Saturday evening, the old low-house
of my best friend’s grandparents, our plays in the alley, where construction of
blocks of apartments was changing in a fast pace. All of this in rather melodramatic
tones for the generations being lost in the passage of time. My short story did
not stand out. As a participant, I received a small booklet with a selection of
student short stories that received distinctions in the competition and my work
I was longing to see printed was not amongst them. The disappointment was momentary
and minimal, at a time when my core ambitions were shifting elsewhere. I
managed to save a manuscript of that first (and last) short story for some
self-criticism and improvements. I still had a life ahead of me for my literary
forays and experiments -I thought, as an amateur and maybe professional writer.
Thenceforth, my writing efforts were limited to essays, as parts of school
assignments, and depending on the motivation, normally low as with most school
work, and the topic we were called upon to address, I regularly won praise –however,
insignificant to resurrect my literary ambitions and spread my wings to that
direction. The respective philologist, after grading our essays, usually
invited me to recite my work in front of an indifferent and noisy class.
Despite the shyness that I possessed by each time a teacher invited me to stand
in front of the blackboard, in those early class environments, I used to
overcome my bashfulness and managed fast-talking, with a relatively steady
albeit flat-pitch voice, to articulate my short theses. But the national exams
for university admission and the grades the most prestigious subjects like
medicine, law or engineering required was were approaching and those ‘extracurricular
activities’ like story writing had to be drastically curtailed. My study and performance
in maths and science were given absolute priority in the allocation of time.
Towards the
end of last year of Lyceum, that would conclude the last stage of our mandatory
education, the progressive philologist of the year, Mrs. B, a petite figure
with the kind and refined manners I mentioned above, assigned us a review of the
works of writer of our choice. I chose Dimitris Hadjis, a communist writer and political
refugee of the diaspora, sentenced to death by the post-civil war courts, and
spent his life, until the transition to democracy in 1974, behind the Iron-Curtain, in Budapest. His short stories and novels -The Double
Book, The End of Our Small Town, and others, I had read with
interest and I was inspired by his linguistic style. I devoted plenty of time
at the expense of few leisurely activities I was afforded, and with commendable
drive and passion I wrote a multi-page essay with a synthesis and the exhibition
of ideas that I found interesting in his novels. With the remarkable volume of books
read on my own accord and initiative I felt that I had acquainted myself with a
wide spectrum of modern Greek literature. I was pleased with the concisely, if
not over-long, written essay I came up with, and my critique of a favorite
author and I expected what I thought was a mature exposition of Hadji's works
would impress Mrs. B, and maybe a handful of half-interested students, as much
as it had impressed Father when he leafed through it. Unfortunately, under the circumstances
in the public school for common people I attended, the presentation ended in a
fiasco -as described above, nulling the little value I had attached to it. That
presentation marked the limit of my lonely journeys in serial reading works of
modern Greek literature and the end of my first timid attempts to write. The last
traces of ambition to become an author were erased as well, although a small
open crack in the depths of mind allowed some light through to shine through
and show me that path I had abandoned, but at an older age, certainly too late
for any career of note as a writer. If once I possessed a little bit of
creativity the art of writing requires, that diminishes with time until it
dries up in later year. Barely time was left to unimaginatively and uninspiringly
salvage some of those memories.
The avid reading
of books, having become an integral part of a ripening youth, turned into other
directions. A career was discouraged along one of the so-called ‘humanities’ paths
from early on: for a ‘positive’ mind, as mine was labelled, only a direction in
scientific or engineering discipline, encompassing mathematics and physics in
its core (subjects which occupied Father’s academic and professional life, as
he proudly proclaimed at each opportunity) would highlight the limited range of
talents I possessed and make the most of my potential. Besides, such
disciplines were more tailored to the male brain and mental inclinations according
to the stereotypes of the time. The ‘humanities’ were not for the highly
intelligent, I was told, and intelligence, always according to Father's preoccupations,
was almost exclusively associated with the ability to negotiate and solve complex
mathematical problems or logic puzzles. Early literary wanderings served only to
formulate one’s language, develop written and oral skills, and, importantly,
obtain a good grade in the cumbersome essays we were asked to come up with in
real-time -in those thorny sessions of the national exams. No one questioned
the importance of language, but cultivating language skills were driven as
means achieve specific goals, rather than an end to a professional engagement in
literature, journalism, historiography, etc. On the other hand, studies in Mathematics
and Physics as levers to success in national exams, aiming at prosperous career
in engineering, subjects cold and barren relying on the use of logic, deprived
me of aesthetic and emotional stimuli, stifled the imagination, made me a less
sensitive, poetic and romantic and lyrical human being, and, perhaps, rather excessively
practical. The opportunity for a golden mean, the equanimity and balance from a
state of mental equilibrium, to borrow a term from physics, was sadly lost
during those school years.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.