Sunday, September 27, 2026

20 - An Insipid Prize

Kazantzis whose entire professional life was devoted to teaching maths with remarkable intensity and passion, inspired me more with the ingenuity, sharpness and acuteness of his brain than the undisputable breadth and depth of mathematical knowledge in his possession. I would have been unable to grasp a chunk of the latter without becoming myself a mathematician, which was not on the table and my career plans. On occasions, subtly encouraged me in that direction: by posing complex problems, which before I even had the time to comprehend its structure and formulation and begin to develop of response, being generally considered slow-witted, he promptly presented the solution himself –with a cigarette permanently between the fingers of his left hand. And he formulated it within minutes in the excellent calligraphy that distinguished him, either with a gold-plated Parker on a white sheet of paper that he laid on his imposing mahogany desk, or on the blackboard in an empty classroom, where I stood beside him. I envied his mathematical brain and tried in vain to emulate his quick and methodical thinking process. Hundreds of problems passed before me, with the crafting of their solutions inflicting considerable mental torture, would serve no practical purpose whatsoever –at least in real life beyond school. They were mostly pickings from Kazantzis' books: the ‘Functions’, the polytomous ‘Algebra’, the ‘Number Theory’, the ‘Polynomials’, and so on, which filled an entire shelf of my bookcase. He was a proliferate author of mathematical textbooks and he duly appreciated me buying his oeuvre and, perhaps, felt flattered seeing his model-student with another of his books, well-read, with main points underlined, marginalia scrawled across pages, and worn out from studying. He often rushed to forewarn me for errors I would spot in those books –and there were plenty: ‘I already made a note of those; they will be corrected in the next edition!’, he would add. With admirable perseverance and tenacity, unprecedented levels of concentration, and the organization and method in studying, attributes I prided myself on, I managed to tame most of their content. The lack of great cognitive processing speed and agility was counter-balanced by perseverance and depth in thought, in proportion to the knowledge I had accumulated from hard study. For that nebulous ‘someone’ in science and engineering I was aspiring to become that maths was more than enough; in fact, superfluous by most professional standards.

The inspiration from Mr. Kazantzis led to some modest success, albeit at national level, in mathematics of course, in that last year of school and adolescence. It now looks as an insignificant dot from the time gap of decades, but it then solidified temporarily an always fragile self-confidence; it even inflated an otherwise skillfully suppressed and hidden ego. It led me to believe in a kind of potential at that threshold of life proper. Delving into the maths itself and study them in depth, as I did for two years thanks to Kazantzis, by a person who was by no means a prodigy, if anything else, formed a hardworking and persistent character, unyielding in the face of problems of any kind, which first and foremost require patience and exhaustive analytical processing, before a final solution is reached. People who can spend hours and even days grappling with a difficult mathematical problem display no less tenacity when confronted with complex situations of a different kind.

In the final year of my high school studies, I was awarded the second national prize in the low-profile and barely publicized annual competition of the Hellenic Mathematical Society. It spread the wings of confidence in mathematics and life beyond. It was unexpected and I felt, based on my own perception of my performance in the competition, a simple commendation would be more appropriate. I suspected Kazantzis, an active and prominent member of the Mathematical Society had a hand in all this, a terrible thought which I struggled not to entertain. Despite my doubts about whether I truly deserved such an accolade, I was basking for days and months in that familiar feeling of self-pride in more or less to everyone at such moments in life for an apparent talent and worth recognized beyond the narrow boundaries of school or the suffocating family environment. I did not boast but Kazantzis did, and surprisingly my parents ignored it: Mother did not understand what it was all about, whilst for both it was seen as a distraction ahead of the university exams.

My school, of course, remained nonchalant to the news. For most teachers it meant nothing; they had no contribution in the small yet nationwide success of one of their students. The teaching profession and employment in the high-school system was no more than at day-to-day job to make a living; it was the routine work of a civil servant. I did not expect any congratulatory mention and recognition in front of the school assembly, neither did I desire it, because of the modest and extremely reserved character. Nevertheless, in the manner of Mr. Notarides, the somehow dignified Mathematics teacher of my last years in Lyceum, I often discerned smiles of approval, perhaps even a recognition and maybe a slight admiration for that achievement. But Mr. Notarides, who imposed himself on an unruly class more by his portly figure than by a gift in teaching maths, was the most relevant to what was all about amongst the ragtag of teachers, and held me in high esteem: I could see it in his eyes when he was seeking a deliverance from the torment of a teacher in front of a non-responsive and indifferent class. Mr. Notarides’ implicit praise I sensed was a scant reward for the support I reluctantly contributed to his uninspiring teachings.

My imagination for its part, still immature as much as vivid, was weaving dreams of broad recognition and fame, gazing at the peaks of mathematics and science, involving the establishment of an own magna theory, attaching my name to at least a theorem and its elegant proof, even the solving of a hitherto unsolved theoretical problem that tormented, if not humanity, the circles of prestigious mathematical intellects. Where were those naïve thought and preposterous ideas rooted? The world of science and mathematics seemed vast in its diversity of domains and disciplines, while I only had a blurred picture through the small loopholes presented to me in the few books I studied here and there, usually school and tutorial textbooks: from Father's bookcase, and whatever interesting ‘aid’ the eye caught in bookstores of Thessaloniki. With the few mathematical tools and knowledge acquired, and indeed consolidated to a basic level, I endeavored lame-crookedly, but with intellectual effort of commendable perseverance as much as vanity, as in some afternoons of earlier yeas when I was trying to understand and naively expand theories of modern Physics, to prove Fermat's famous theorem that tormented the minds of great mathematicians for centuries. To no avail, of course, here too, as with particle physics some time back, despite the dozens of false starts and pages of scribbled notes with symbols and equations that filled the floor of my room. Whom did I think I become after that low-key award?

Not much fuss, not a single announcement about the Mathematical Society's award at the school assembly or class was made, thankfully for the shy and modest character who trembled in front of and amongst people. The praise and the smiles and the friendly pats on the back came less from the family environment than Kazantzis himself, who showed more pride than close relatives. And his praise counted the most given the great mathematician he was. Possibly he considered himself the mastermind behind my success, which was unprecedented for a student of his small tutoring school. The wings the prize spread would not take long to be clipped, at least partially, and for me to land onto realistic levels of self-awareness and self-esteem, and become again rational and level-headed vis a vis my mathematical genius. The illusions a young man, perhaps justifiably, cultivates around himself for success and glory in his life and the self-centered thoughts he harbors about a special and gifted personality, talent and intellect, would soon be suppressed. The narcissism that followed this and a similar minor success in the university entry exams was henceforth exhausted in temporary reflections of the self with consciousness, on the four walls of my room, without much resonance outside those walls. But that prize had somehow shielded my ego for the battles in the arenas of adult life.

Eight of us, the Society's awardees, eight ‘mathematical talents’ so to speak who excelled in that year's competition, would represent the country at the annual International Mathematical Olympiad, which in July 1981, after the most welcome end of high school studies, ahead of university enrolment and the enticing student life (or the beginning of ‘academic’ life, as my parents liked to put it), in Washington DC. For me, a lonely person for the best part of those years, with a non-existent social life and intimate friendships and especially female ones, a teenager starved of the experiences and sensations of love often the butt of tasteless jokes by the two or three bullies in the class, who had spotted and sneered at my ‘virginity’ (or incel as called today) and the pimples of my face, which their theory went had no other cause than systematic masturbation in my room or a seedy cinema auditorium, the anticipation a trip to America and the student life that would immediately follow flooded my being with enthusiasm and a longing for the future, for after school life. It was state of an unprecedented bliss, beyond and above the school routine I would soon leave behind, once and for all, as a thankless and gray and depressing part of life. I drew little satisfaction from the thought that many of my schoolmates who mocked my social isolation and celibacy might feel a little envy, now that the chains of school would be shaken off, as they would face up to a future of different and less attractive prospects.

That poor country, my homeland, still held a small, albeit shrinking place in my heart. The rare distinctions of Greek athletes and teams in international competitions still stirred some patriotic emotions of pride, and that country, with its scarce means, would pay for our Olympic Airways' tickets to New York. The expectations of the few, who had a concept of what this international competition was all about, were low from the onset, and the publicity our participation received non-existent: taking part in the so-called Mathematical Olympiad was a small internal affair of the insular family of the Mathematical Society, comprising a sub-section of maths teachers, along with some hobbyists and dilettantes of mathematics with a residual passion for the subject. The school, as long as it was not yet formally finished, kept its distance from my participation in that unknown international arena, indifferent to any kind of individual distinction -no matter how small or large. The reasons were various and explicable. The root causes were to be found: in the structure of the educational system and its chronic inability to inspire and mold talented students and even identify their talents and inclinations; in the body of generally mediocre and unqualified teachers, a homogeneous and amorphous body, which they viewed their profession through the prism of civil servant. With a unity in purpose and an unambiguous direction, and a disclaimer of responsibility for poor results without accountability or assessment, they had undertaken to teach to the letter, in the predetermined period of time of the school year, a predetermined syllabus bureaucratically dictated by the ministry. Those teachers, with a few exceptions, could well and perhaps have preferred to teach in half-empty classrooms, spared from the ordeal of ill-discipline from the bulk of unruly and inattentive teenage students. The indifference was mutual. A plethora of tutoring centers and private schools, those para-education establishments, had undertaken (with the accountability that the parents who paid tuition fees would demand) the assimilation of this exam material in every possible way and its implantation in young minds, mechanically and with over-the-odds intensity. A substantial and valuable education of young people was of secondary importance.  

Saturday, September 5, 2026

19 - The Maths Teacher

The classical physics we were taught at school in the ‘bundle’ of subjects in science, like Chemistry and Biology, were relatively easy to walk through. Some basic intelligence and plenty of memorization, of the rote learning kind, almost guaranteed good grades in the university entry exams. Enlightenment from new knowledge and erudition in one of the more interesting modern fields in science would have to wait for admission to a decent university school. Therefore, the physics into which Father tried discreetly to introduce me took back seat in my studies for the exams, while mathematics, being at the core of the ‘positive’ sciences or rather engineering I was aspiring to study and, for that matter, the most challenging for the majority of the candidates, was brough under the spotlight -and rightly so. The maths questions and problems in our school textbooks the brain was called upon to deal with, some of which admittedly cumbersome, I did manage to grapple with, mostly thanks to tenacity and perseverence than genius. That embarrassing episode of one Saturday evening, with the problem I was presented with by Mr. N, our family friend, before going out with my parents, a problem, which, as I was told, Billy, his son, of the same age as me managed to solve with ease (as Mr. N told me, presumably either to put untoward pressure on me or brag about Billy’s brilliance or both) and I did not manage to answer after wrestling for an hour for a solution and had to abandon it unsolved before going to bed (naturally to the detriment of my self-confidence and the disappointment of my parents), that episode had long been forgotten.

The late mathematician of my last and most creative and knowledge-absorptive phase of late adolescence, Theodoros Kazantzis or ‘Roulis’ -for Father, friends and colleagues, in whose tutoring school I was enrolled free of charge, an honour bestowed from Roulis –due to my good performance and grades at school, and an above average intellectual ability (as I was embarrassingly touted outside our family circle by Father), and his previous acquaintance from their student days in the 1950s, Kazantzis, more than any other teacher, became an inspiration and gave me a direction at a critical junction in life. Famous theorems and the elegance of their proofs by mathematicians whose names filled Kazantzis’ mouth and opened his eyes wide in awe, each time he mentioned them with pomp, glorious names of his trade like Fermat’s, Kolmogorov’s, Leibnitz’s, Poincare’s et al. turned my aspirations and ambitions and a short-lived youthful devotion to mathematics instead, away from early literary explorations. The latter were considered by many in Greece shallow in terms of the depth of thought expended and lacking the wealth of mental permutation and combinations· for literature and language, Father and the broad wrinkled brows of mathematical intellects, saw them as something easy for the brain to grasp and deal with, as a more trivial and prosaic, but less abstract, formal and concrete way to communicate thought and ideas than that of mathematical symbols -the language of logic and reason. Whether this direction proved a posteriori right or wrong a posteriori does not matter. After all, it is pointless such choices to be the object of retrospective reflection, and any conclusions drawn such introspection is immaterial at later stages of life.

Kazantzis was an admirable personality, unforgettable by those who had the opportunity to be guided by him in maths, a bright star that illuminated for two, otherwise dim, years my journey along the never-ending path of intellectual development. He would influence and inspire any young person who might have displayed an interest in maths, provided he or she possessed sufficient intelligence and comprehension of them. Sadly, for the mass of students who attended those tutoring schools, such a thing, that special mathematical inclination and intelligence, let alone a talent in maths, Kazantzis was looking for (beside their tuition fees), were lacking. Widespread private tutoring, in ad hoc schools or, for the wealthy, at home, paper over the cracks of a deficient public educational system private was born out and flourished out of deep-rooted social issues and the economic reality in Greece and is persistent and still in high demand by students, whilst they are subjected to the stress and the incessant pressure by their families for a university place. In short, those schools offer to their students the crutches to walk through ominous university entry exams, success in which is deemed crucial (as they are told) for their future lives and well-being.

As a major attraction for a unique ability communicate complex concepts and magnetize his audience, but also being the owner and boss and absolute ruler in his school, Kazantzis entered and left the classrooms at will, without any regards to an agreed timetable, which he himself probably had drawn up at the beginning of the year, tailor-made to his personal needs, and subscribed to. Most of the time he did not show-up to deliver his lecture, without prior notice and to the dismay of his students waiting for him, like beggars stretching their hands for alms. My school mate Yiannis D, who had been influenced by the more than average inclination and good performance in maths I had shown, after some non sequitur reasoning regarding the choice of tutoring he decided to join me to Kazantzis’ school. Each time he did not turn up to the expectant class, Yiannis protested, complaining about the tuition fees he had already paid with an unfulfilled demand of being taught personally by him, given his transmissibility and communicative abilities. He somehow believed Kazantzis possessed the magic wand that would implant mathematical analytical thinking in a (put mildly) mediocre brain. Puffing and muttering in my ear every now and then, and especially with every no show of Kazantzis, he ‘threatened’ to move to a different tutoring school· something that, after a few fruitless months at a desk next to me he did, to the relief of those who had been directly or indirectly (like me) involved in his initial decision.

A silent dissatisfaction, followed by murmurs of discontent by Roulis’ students, who had been patiently waiting for his arrival. They could hardly be appeased by the appearance of a ‘relief’ tutor at his place, usually a young graduate, who, with a few minutes' notice, would take over the reins of teaching us maths. (Not necessarily well-off families had to pay handsomely for each hour of tutoring with the anticipation of success in the exams.) Often, the young Roulis’ substitute appeared accompanied by his boss, who, after a few excuses and lame explanations behind his artfully disarming smile of the reasons preventing him ‘this time round’ to deliver his lecture to the expectant class (’because something unexpected had cropped up’), a praise for the worthiness of the substitute apprentice tutor, and a brief prologue as to the intended content of the lecture, he left the room in the same way as he had entered it: with one hand in the pocket of his waistcoat and the other, inevitably, holding a cigarette.

He was barely one meter and sixty centimetres tall, but an erect posture, a large and well-shaped head, featuring a broad forehead furrowed by wrinkles, befitting deep thinkers and intellects, as in busts of famous philosophers of antiquity, the wavy and messy, blackish-gray hair, along with his expensive three-piece suit attire, enhanced his personality with an aura that disguised the short stature. His features and presence radiated mathematical ingenuity, intellectual energy and exuded a masculine charm and overshadowed his physical littleness in the eyes of women at least, as I later found out when I met his attractive and, of course, much taller wife. (The height of a man, we read in the popular press of the time, was one of the main physical characteristics that attracted women to a man, therefore what height my body would reach in adulthood was of appreciable concern and preoccupied me and family during adolescence. Consequently, I was convinced a short stature of Roulis’ level would be a serious impediment in attracting the female sex, and the existence of such a short man would fatefully and obsessively be absorbed by a job or a life-long interest, like maths. What a shame, I was thinking then along with the longings I was harbouring for the opposite sex, guiding then much of our teenage behaviour, even within the confines of my tutoring school, which, unlike my school, was mixed.)

Eccentric and uncompromising, he reserved the praise only for his colleagues - subordinates in his tutoring school and a few former associates in his ventures, in short, the few who managed to endure a partnership with a cumbersome and demanding character, and the few young mathematicians whom he nurtured in mathematics and had successful careers. Only a handful of personalities from the Greek mathematical world he would unreservedly praise and even dedicated some of his books to them: those whom he had the good fortune to meet or whose work he studied, from the pantheon of late great Greek mathematicians, such as Caratheodory, and a certain professor Varopoulos, his and Father’s teacher in the university and renowned like Kazantzis for his eccentricity. But for most of the people in his trade and his time and place, whether academics, tutors, or high-school teachers, he reserved derogatory comments and scorn, usually condensed into terse disapprovals and aphorisms and expressed without further elaboration –as if they were axiomatic, a priori given or too obvious to argue against: "The fool!", "A disgraceful character!", "An irrelevant person!", " The idiot!", "What a Karagiozis!", etc., were the kind of phrases he habitually used to degrade fellow mathematicians, low in his esteem.

The few times he turned up in the classroom to deliver his maths lecture to a restless and expectant class (few despite the grandiose commitments to the students and parents at the beginning of the school year), he entered the room several minutes after the scheduled start, dressed in his three-piece suit (if he was in a hurry) or in waistcoat or sleeveless sweater over his shirt and tie. And he managed to magnetize everyone from the very first moment, including the few studious amongst us, the nerds, so to speak, with a solid background and generally good understanding of high-school maths, but also the relatively indifferent or the desperate for tutoring with lower levels of understanding and perhaps intelligence.

Between the index and the middle finger of his left hand a cigarette was burning incessantly, a cigarette he was dragging at intervals of a few minutes, until its long column of ash fell off from the pull of gravity. In his right he held a chalk leaving white traces around the pocket of his waistcoat. He lectured without any written notes, with the confidence and arrogant spirit of a brilliant man he undoubtedly was, a grand-maître who had the theorems of mathematics in his fingertips, a man recognized by his professional circle, despite his controversial character and the intense competition in the trade of private tutoring -the shadow-education thriving in Greece to counterbalance the inadequacies of the public education system. I formed the belief then that his career was trapped in that rather ignoble sector for political reasons and poor public relations. He might as well had been ostracised from the community of university professors, although his genius and knowledge surpassed many of those. He would always start his lesson, writing from the upper right corner of the blackboard, where he posed the problem to be solved or the theorem to be proven· with remarkable agility in the use of chalk and unparalleled calligraphy, he ended up in the lower right corner, covering the board with three or four columns of mathematical symbols and equations, inserting at points emphatic adverbs, such as ‘therefore’, ‘consequently, etc., in the solution of the problem or the proof of the theorem, which triumphantly ended with a QED! During this process, which all of us followed in awe and silent behind our desks, some bewildered, he would occasionally turn towards the fascinated and enchanted class, in order (I thought) to reassure himself of our amazement at his intelligence and knowledge. Eventually, with his back turned to that work of art, a work of intellectual elegance and calligraphy as displayed on the blackboard, he would ask his class a question or two, which, however, after a few seconds of pause, when his restless and sparkling eyes shifted from left to right, he would himself answer. The completion of a proof on the board was accompanied by an abrupt, almost dancing 180-degree turn to face the class, accompanied by slight shaking of his untidy fringe by the centrifugal forces from his turn, the throwing of what was left of the chalk in the general direction of the blackboard, the extinguishing of his cigarette with his foot after one last drag, a triumphant smile, and the piercing rays from his gaze. Another lighting of a cigarette would follow, before his hasty departure from the room. The class, after the great mathematician’s departure was in a hurry to copy the contents of the artwork on the blackboard to the last letter. It would have been weeks before the students of his tutoring school would enjoy a similar sought-after performance.

Monday, August 24, 2026

18 - A Physics Conference in Mytilene

The success of the first conference in Thessaloniki whetted the appetite of the Panhellenic Union of Physicists and laid the foundations for a second national conference, three years later in the October of 1980. Mytilene, the capital of the picturesque Aegean Island of Lesvos, was selected for the conference venues. I was dragged along without having afforded a say. Father either saw that I had begun to mature scientifically and, therefore, the conference would be another useful experience, as his main argument was, before I would spread my wings and fly over the plains of positive science –with Physics at its core. He still attached a significant value Physics (probably unfounded or disproportionate, with regards to the personal or social impact of this branch of science) and the role of physicists in the economy and culture of Greece. Besides, as far as he was concerned, that would give him another opportunity to interact on par academics and university professors, many former fellow students and some old friends from his university years. He counted on, or rather was convinced of the interest such a conference would arouse and, maybe, open the first doors that would lead to the academic career he secretly but fervently desired for me. Many of the speakers and delegates would potentially be my university teachers in a year time.

Later in life, I became convinced of his deep-seated regrets of he not pursuing an academic career or, for some vague reasons, of being deprived of it. In truth, as Father was prescribing and planning my future strictly within our national borders without soliciting my opinion, there were not many prestigious professional occupations outside university for the capable scientist he believed I was. In any case, in those teenage years, as a guardian and undisputed custodian of his sons’ education, he used to see it as a fatherly duty to bring me along and introduce me to circles of colleagues, often against and regardless of my reluctance -because of timidity and reserve.

So, I followed him, despite the reflexive objections of an introvert, which rarely expressed as a teenager as this caused fearsome reaction and scolding. Of course, all that instinctive reticence was rooted in an innate timidity and lack of confidence and a range of phobias in the face of social interactions, especially in the company of mature scientists in which I did not belong. The idea of socializing in domains outside an entrenched individual space, which we call ‘comfort zone’, unsettled me. On the other hand, a ship voyage by ship to Lesvos, a first to a Greek island and, as it happens, the last on that specific island, was enticing and excited me. I found solace in the thought of the hours of solitude in some hidden corners of the large ship, hanging on from the handrails, endlessly gazing the waves and their white foamy crests, the seagulls chasing stern. Time on a ship surrounded by the desolate vastness of the blue and black sea fascinated and lured my since I was a child. It would be sufficient enticement to counter-balance worries from a deficient sociability.

The ship set sail from Thessaloniki’s port to the east in a warm October later afternoon leaving the sun behind us to its always imperious setting behind the Olympus mountains standing tall beyond the west coast of the bay. The evening darkness was falling fast, as always in October, and I did what I always want to do on a ship since childhood: going up and down the decks, contemplating the waves illuminated obliquely by the sunset, sparkling with the reflections of yellow and orange, and before long by the faint light of the crescent moon commanding the clear firmament and leaving a white trembling trace on the blackness of the sea. I enjoyed the crisp sea air for hours on the top deck close to the bow, letting the breeze dishevel my hair, feeling the salt spray and the droplets escaping from the wavetops on my cheeks. A group of colleagues from Father’s telecom company and other delegates known to him were talking with loud voices and gestures under the canopy of the deck below. Father's voice, as always, stood out above the clamour the rumble of the ship engines, stentorian and assertive, counter-arguing and pontificating on any issue. I heard a man called Adam, his colleague and closest at the time, apparently annoyed from Father’s opinionative attitude, describe his voice as hissing and sibilant. He likely felt it piercing to the ears, annoying in its intensity, which on many occasions certainly was. After the night fall we retreated to warm ship cafeteria, where I enjoyed the galley cooks’ meal of meatballs with rice in the restaurant, as I always do on board of Greek ships. 

After a few hours of botched sleep in a suffocating bunk-bed of the economy class cabin, battling with in turns snoring from Father and the two strangers we shared the cabin with, I went down to the bow for a glimpse of the morning glorious sun, proudly asserting itself from Anatolia, illuminating the Mytilene seafront and its promenade drawing closer. As the ship began its awkward manoeuvres to moor at the quayside, which I always find fascinating, the handful of boatswains tasked with preparing the hawsers drove away with shouts the few curious individuals like me from the bow. The few scattered figures of dockers and fishermen in the harbour meant that Mytilene was just waking up to the day. The ship’s arrival was the first highlight of the day for the early risers amongst the island’s inhabitants and tourists alike, but soon the promenade and its cafes will be bustling with people for the morning coffee and a fresh pie.   

The afternoon of the first day passed indifferently and carefree win the company of a group of Physicists, friends of Father, dining together in a Mytilene taverna with the usual gestures and clamour and racket inherent in such Greek gatherings -of either educated or illiterate people. Father, as always, with his loud voice established himself at the centre of attention and the inevitable arguments, even when discussions touched upon innocuous, non-controversial issues (like Physics as a science, of their Union, of the Conference and its sessions), as those themes were spontaneously risen in the flow of the otherwise convivial evening. I listened silently and nonchalantly to the verbal confrontations of old acquaintances, friends and colleagues, as, thankfully, I was ignored by the adult company. I quickly became bored, as I was hearing names people unknown to me, like Karoubalos, Resvanis, Charalambous, apparently distinguished academics of the time, bright stars of international acclaim of some sort, bearers of modern trends in Physics research in Greece, who, as far as I could understood, would honour the conference as speakers. Several names were commented upon, some belittled with derogatory remarks, others endowed with laudatory comments, made the rounds of the table, like names, market values, past performances of players in a football team's lineup are discussed amongst fans prior to a game. The talk around a certain Yiannis Iliopoulos, a distinguished theoretical physicist of the Greek diaspora caught my attention and impressed me most, as he was mentioned and keenly discussed by the party with noticeable admiration, especially of rumours of his nomination for a Nobel Prize in Physics. I surmised that the expectations amongst the ‘common mortals’ of Greek Physics, for a scientist of his calibre to honour the little conference of his homeland was high; his presence would raise enormously its profile, as well as that of the organizing body, the Union of Greek Physicists. At the end of the conference, it occurred to me that eventually Iliopoulos did not attend, to the disappointment of many delegates, as this took something away from the prestige of the Conference. However I also heart that some amongst the minority of a narrow minded academic nomenklatura, displayed not just indifference but even some furtive joy as his presence could have potentially overshadowed their research and lower their status in the scientific community, a status a few achieved with skewed methods, relying on nepotism, favouritism and the like within the opaque walls of the Greek academia. In other words, as it may happen, big name participants or absentees of international calibre, can cause side effects on mindset and behavior of the small Greek scientific community, in particular to its niche academic castes in pioneering disciplines, such as Nuclear Physics or Particle Physics or Theoretical Physics· these are disciplines in which Greece, from an economic and historical standpoint, could not and did not have much to contribute on the international stage, while the state pays handsomely to professors to delve into and produce research of little or no impact to country’s wealth.

In the evening, Father dropped me at the hotel after treating me with some street-souvlaki, before he carried on his socializing with a pool of colleagues and old friends from university or past employments, in the endless conversations mainly of political nature, which pleased him. Those were the hours when he, a deeply egocentric and self-centred man, asserted himself above a group of people and became the centre of attention and given his chance to provoke arguments and disputes or contradict the theses of others in politics, society, science, etc. with intransigent opinions and an imposing voice. Those various conversations, those dialectical confrontations -one might say with acquaintances or strangers, friends or enemies, were inconsequential and largely ineffectual in altering one’s opinion on any given subject. They were happening just for the sake of the vibrant dialogues they started.

Our hotel was an old, two-storey building, crammed unnoticed in a row of other low dwellings in one of the alleys of the old-town of Mytilene behind the seafront and promenade. The evening was pleasantly warm and peaceful and offered the few hours of autonomy and the precious solitude and I was longing for after a noisy day. We were sharing a triple-bed room with a colleague of Father’s for budgetary reasons. I lied in the bed of my choice by the wall, reading a novel and leafing through the program of the conference. Later, I went out to the small balcony of the upper floor, rested my chin on my forearm on the railing to watch the movements of the few passers-by below. Fleeting vague thoughts swirled my mind about the mentally exhausting day I spent amongst strangers, and the even more difficult dawning ahead of the first day of the conference. The autumn visitors of the island, few tourists and conference delegates, were scattered in the taverns and cafes along the waterfront. The alley under our balcony, with only a pale light from the lamp of the wooden electricity pole by the street corner illuminating it was half-dark and deserted.

I began feeling sleepy despite the slight apprehension about an unknown tomorrow caused. The tranquillity of a street away from the tedious world of scientists and their conference was interrupted by voices of two islanders who entered the alley from the direction of the port. They seemed in a state of merriment, surely from the ouzo they consumed in a local taverna· Mytilene is nationally renowned for its ouzo. They were singing, blurting out jokes, heedless as to whom might be listening from behind closed doors, unconcerned about disturbing the silence in those quiet late hours. One of the friends, as they were passing under my balcony without noticing me above their head, demonstrated three light jumps on one of his legs and let loose an equal number of farts. Pre-planned, intense, harmonic and rhythmic, not dissimilar to sounds I and my child friend Kostakis produced by puffing out onto the skin of our forearms on the ground floor of our apartment building, and burst out laughing at the acoustic effects. I giggled again at that unexpected comic episode. I recalled that incident in the alley of Mytilene years later, when Peter Ustinov, asked by a TV presenter what theme in comedy invariably cause laughter, timelessly and universally, regardless of the age and educational level of the audience, promptly answered: farting and flatology, in general. He was right.

The balmy evening into night passed like this: calmly and pleasantly and with a little bit of unexpected amusement from the farting incident, until I fell asleep. Around midnight I was woken up by the arrival of Father and his colleague with whom we were sharing that cheap triple-bed room. The colleague whispered something subtly and made an effort not to make noise and wake, unlike Father, who usually kept the usually volume of voice at inconsiderably high levels. I pretended to be asleep, but the presence of a stranger in the next bed somehow unsettled me and I stayed awake, until late after midnight to sounds of loud, sustained snoring coming from Father's bed. As much as I laughed at the antics of the two Mytilenean friends under our balcony, I was just as embarrassed of Father's snoring. I was sure it would be a nuisance for the quiet stranger at the other end of the room, and kept as both awake, incapable of doing anything to stop it. I eventually fell asleep late well after midnight, having suppressed my embarrassment and with the hope the stranger in our room managed to get some sleep, though I could barely hear him breathing for as long as I was awake. 

From the inaugural day of the conference, although most ignorant of advanced topics in Physics incomprehensible, I was naturally attracted by sessions that sounded ‘exotic’ to my scientifically immature mind, like Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics. As alluring as those sessions sounded, unsurprisingly, I made no much sense out of what was presented, despite a keen interest to comprehend and the effort I put in just to ‘get a vague idea’ of what each of these trends was all about. The mental fatigue and boredom following those incomprehensible presentations was to be somehow moderated by a day trip to Molyvos, taking place on a reserved by the organizers for the entertainment and mingling of delegates and speakers· an opportunity for chatting and gossip, ice-breaking and relaxation, on the sidelines of the heavy scientific program – thankless for many like me with his utter ignorance and young age. We arrived at the village of Molyvos shortly before noon, after a two-hour journey through slopes of mountains covered with bushes and shrubs, barren patches, through some basins with olive groves and vineyards, old farmhouses amongst scattered cypresses and small orchards. It was a landscape which at my age I had found indifferent. In later years I discovered a strong appeal in the tranquillity and solace of those mediterranean landscapes.

The various groups of physicists were scattered in the alleys of that picturesque coastal village. Father, as always on occasions bring him close to the shores of the Aegean, was irresistibly drawn by the crystal clear and lukewarm October waters. He defied the pebbles and stones of a narrow beach at the waterfront outside the village fenced by rocks, as the well as the urchins on the sea bed and had his obligatory bath. As for me, satiated by ‘sea bathing’, the sine qua non of each of my Greek summer holidays, after I splashed my feet on the shallows, whilst keeping a mind on the sea urchins that lurked in the crevices of rocks, I spent the rest of the time sitting on the sunburnt pebbles, under a friendlier sun than that of our August holidays, throwing stones into the water, listening to the soft murmur of waves and gazing listlessly at the distant blue horizon. My sensual relationship with the sea has always been more audiovisual and olfactory, rather than the more daring tactile relationship between body and water.

The taverna where we ended up with several conference delegates, most acquaintances of Father’s, for the inevitable lunchtime feast was located at the far end of an alley under a vine. The last tables of the taverna reached out the very end of the alley fenced by a balustrade at the top of mortared stone wall raised above a narrow coastal road underneath. The fortunate taverna patrons could savour the immaculate blue of the sea and the sky whilst enjoying traditional local specialities with their ouzo and retsina. The conversation in Father’s party that started from the moment were seated and carried on lively and uninterrupted throughout the meal to the sweet treats and the coffee that followed, left me indifferent and unable to participate. I savoured the neglect of the adults around me. My eyes were exploring the freshly painted walls of the low-houses on either side of the alley, the souvenir shops beyond, the dark interior of the taverna, the coming and going of its patrons, and the few tourists that reached that end of the village, until they rested at a couple sitting at the last table, by the balustrade, leaning on the railings and on each other's shoulders, and silently gazing at open sea yonder. The man wore a white shirt with its sleeves rolled up below the elbows, contrasting his swarthy skin and his thick and black wavy hair, covering tousled his neck and falling just above his shoulders, a ferocious thick moustache like that I saw sported by many Cretan lads. He was now and then bringing his right arm around the shoulders of a woman next to him, to embrace her tighter and pull her closer to him. And it was then when they turned their faces to the side of each other and exchanged kisses, which lasted a few seconds, oblivious to a group of middle-aged conservative scholars eating their lunch and talking physics. Those were clearly erotic kisses, kisses expressing deep intimacy and strong desire. Even a person like me, who had never kissed a girl by then, could sense the lust permeating the two lovers and visualise their lovemaking later in the day. Those were kisses and touches and exchanges of lustful looks, in silence. Perhaps, they did not speak the same language and interacted through sensual romantic gestures, like kisses and caresses, instead of words.

It was also clear that they descended from different races. The woman had straight, long platinum-blonde hair, parted in half. At some point she got up and headed towards the door and the interior of the tavern, and I could see her affront. It was obvious to me that under here light green, simple and linen, gossamer mini-dress, which hanged over her slender body by two thin laces, she was wearing absolutely nothing. The nipples of her breasts, slightly sagging despite her young age, were clearly outlined in sensual and arousing details. Her sunbathing-red brown tanned skin and hair color pointed to a Northern European, perhaps Scandinavian origin, while the physiognomy of her partner, his masculinity and erotic effusiveness, pointed to stereotypes I had formed at the time of Greek ‘καμάκι’ (harpoons), which in summer time prey on blonde tourists from the sexually liberated north, who descend to Greece from the sun and the sea and romantic adventures.

From those sagging breasts in the slender figure, but mainly from the color and parting right in the middle of her long straight hair and her Nordic cheekbones, I recognized that woman: she was, without a doubt the foreign starlet of a couple of Greek porno movies, those second rate films of mediocre quality in double-bill porn shows· in seedy cinemas I used to frequent since early high school years, driven by the weight of sexual repression and frustration from hormonal urges -a kind of psychological addiction I found difficult to curb, even in adulthood. (And why should I, if it had been a harmless well-kept secret from friends and family, a valuable aid in lifting those hormonal burdens during a barren adolescent life devoid of sexual experiences, a relief from frustration, an aid to some form of gratification. Whether the ‘products’ of that industry I enjoyed had an indirect detrimental impact-no matter how small- on the lives of its workers, perhaps, even of that young woman in the taverna with her lover (or, maybe, pimp) concerned me sometimes, but not to an extent to curtail those habits.) Observing the couple then I wondered: was their love genuine and pure or some kind of fleeting, opportunistic, hedonistic, aimed exclusively at ephemeral pleasure, whilst making also some money, perhaps? How possible erogenous causes led to a genuine love affair? Was the man aware of this woman’s past and even present in that despicable industry? If so, did it bother him? Did he participate in the same or similar films and I had just naturally failed to notice him? (His unfamiliar physiognomy, after the many films of the genre I had watched, did not rule out the possibility of being an actor himself, as the male porn watchers’ attention is mainly focused on the faces and bodies of the women protagonists.) Could it be, in the final analysis, that he himself urged or manipulated her into that squalid avenue of ungainly and, for many, lewd and humiliating roles, as an agent or pimp, for personal gain? If there was something more than a fleeting intimacy in that couple's story, I would never know. These and other such thoughts, mixed with images from the movies and sex scenes with the woman actress sitting close to use, distracted me from the tedious discussions of the physicists around me. When we got up to leave, the sun had begun its decent towards the sea. We left the couple there, under the arbour, still hanging on the railings with their heads intimately touching, savouring their love and the glorious sunset.

From the sessions on the frontiers of modern physics research, in the next and last day of the conference, I gained, as an aspiring scientist myself, from little to none. The figments of magic I was expecting in the few specialized, mostly dry and laden with mathematics presentations, in astrophysics or particle physics or quantum mechanics, were elusive· neither them, nor of the speaker, with some at least oratory skills, managed to inspire me. I would have to return back to the basics: the text books of classical physics for a deeper understanding of more prosaic material for the purpose of a good grade in the final exams at the end of that school year. As it turned out, physics did not become the science where I dedicated the most financially lucrative parts of my career, although it offered a few valuable tools to that end. My childish ambitions to formulate a new theory of the world and its matter and particles, the unification of the theories of the microcosm and the universe I often heard, the afternoons of reverie in the company of Father's university physics books reached an inglorious end with the conclusion of that second panhellenic physics conference. Father mentioned several times in different context and settings, but always in his well-known authoritarian and arrogant style, which a priori rejected counter-arguments and often exasperated his interlocutors, that he would never allow me to pursue a career in nuclear physics: it would cause cancer and early death. Back then, as a teenager, I suppressed my aggravation from similar career and life controlling decrees and mandates and concealed my anger and resentment, retreating to just the downcast face of defeat to any such arguments. Later in life, they caused rage and altercation. Yet, such prima facia inconsequential impressions can subliminally stir one’s course in life in one direction or another. Apparently, and sadly in a way, I followed in some of his footsteps and partially inherited Father’s special trait of exercising authority and coercing opinions to the few people I had some influence over and felt resentment if they rejected them.

In the last session on Thursday afternoon, there would be an open discussion on the prospects of basic academic physics research in Greece. The members of the panel consisted mostly of university professors, but there were also some the humbler representatives of researchers’ and teachers’ associations. Seated in a row on an elevated platform behind a long table facing the layman audience, the most vocal members of the panel, that is, the haughty academics amongst them, expressed the opinion that state funds for research should be doubled and even multiplied from current levels. Greece should reach the same levels as north American and western European governments expenditure on research, to expand its foundations and scope, as it is blessed with ‘good brains’, Greeks being a select race genetically gifted. It is no coincidence, most of the panel argued, albeit without statistical evidence, that Greek émigrés pursuing scientific careers excel in their disciplines. A view, I assumed, was also shared by most of the attendees in the room, panel members and audience alike. State-sponsored academics, researchers and teachers, in fields with no cross-section with the real economy in Greece, made up the relative if not absolute majority amongst the attendees. In any case, research funding in one way or another, in say disciplines like Solid State or Nuclear Physic should be provided from the state coffers of a rather poor country, whatever that meant or implied. Private organizations with the financial muscle to funding such ‘basic’ or ‘academic’ research of longer term and wider scope, were non-existent, and Greece’s low-tech and light always relied on tried and mature traditional methods of production to make a profit and good use of its outcome.

Father, seated next to be in the one of the back-row seats of a half-full room, stood up and with the familiar arrogant and quasi-sarcastic style, the loud and imposing voice, piercing to the ear, intervened with a meant-to-be rhetorical question: ‘Is the Greek academia, in areas such as the Solid State, capable of absorbing efficiently and for the benefit of society the funds asked for by the panel professors?" (For inexplicable reasons, even to ignorant self, this Solid State Physics I heard a lot about throughout the course of the conference, and thought about it as a somewhat boring discipline for one to dedicate their most creative years, enjoyed a disproportionately large weight amongst the research endeavours of physics departments, and, from the little I knew, Greece’s economy did not produce any of the exotic ‘materials’ that were subject of that research and it was unlikely to ever do so).

As much as I was irritated by Father’s categorical and sweeping statements, whether those concerned personal or family issues, I could not but admired him for his assertive intervention in that session of an elite group of university professors of physics: for his self-confidence, straightforwardness, the clarity of his speech, gifts that Mother used to reluctantly admit found charming when they first met. As expected, and it is possible the ultimate purpose of Father's intervention was to stir waters and prick consciences, even provoke emotions and a reaction, or, as one would say today troll the visibly annoyed members of the panel and the audience, at least those whom his question photographed. An intense dialogue ensued on the issue of government grants for academic research, which Father followed impassively, although, surely with an inconspicuous feeling of satisfaction. I turned into myself mildly disappointed that I did not inherit the gift of confidence, bravado and bravery, but some other attributes of Father’s less useful in life.

I saw the porn actress whom I recognized in that taverna of Molyvos again on our ship from Mytilene back to Thessaloniki. She was standing not far from me on the upper deck, at the guardrail of the stern. She was wearing the same skimpy dress, with her beautiful long blonde hair was blowing in the sea breeze. With her right arm raised she was waving with slow movements her farewell to someone on land. The ship was sailing away from the dock and at the edge of quay there he was: standing with his legs slightly apart, his right hand on the forehead to block the glaring sun from the west. It was the same swarthy, dark-haired lad with the Cretan moustache, in his white shirt standing still in the same pose for minutes. As we were receding, he became an insignificant lonely dot, still but visible at the edge of the waterway. His mistress continued the wave at him with her arm, a gesture of the prolonged farewell, as if it were the very last, until Mytilene’s port and its people disappeared from our view behind the jetty. The melancholy in this prolonged farewell moved me. Own farewells to people I loved in the future, I found them emotionally terrifying in the future and left long-lasting unconsolable impressions in the memory and soul.

Sunday, July 26, 2026

17 - Father's Physics

I tracked the quasi-predestined course from early in life, with a few certificates under arms -in the domain of traditional positive sciences before engineering, guided less by my own initiative than external influence, which by and large acted upon me subconsciously. My involvement in sports activities I enjoyed and early literary ambitions were suppressed and suspended. My writings and discourse obtained technical, dry and wooden forms. Afterall, how many people make a decent living from writing stories or playing football?

The 1st Panhellenic Conference of the Union of Greek Physicists took place in the autumn of 1977 in Thessaloniki in a pavilion of the city’s Internation Trade Fair. Father was appointed member of the organizing committee, by virtue of his degree and short career in teaching physics, assigned the responsibility of providing telecom support for the conference, given his position in the Greek Telecom monopoly. It was also an opportunity for him, this conference, to exercise his self-proclaimed passion, from his student days for the branch science he chose to study, that is physics, although this passion had likely been weakened by the non-creative, routine work, more bureaucratic than technical, in the public telecom which had already employed him for a decade. The new school year had not started yet and I was towed along to the conference venue for a glimpse of the preparations he was overseeing, convinced that I might be intrigued, but also to introduce me to some of his fellow physicists-professors, potentially future teachers of mine in the future, although we both knew than not of much the aims of that gathering of physicists and the content of the sessions would have made much sense to me. It was the very first conference after the transition to democracy and, apparently, a milestone for the small society of Greek physicists, and besides for Father it carried the importance of a reunion with his university mates. It was even more important for the body of academics amongst them, who would dominate the technical sessions, less so, perhaps, for school teachers of physics or the few physics graduates, like Father, employed in engineering jobs in the public sector. And I could sense its importance for the members of the organizing committee members by the hustling, the handshakes and lively conversations between the various volunteers, many acquaintances of Father’s from his student days, and the few years he devoted in physics research and teaching, and the few curious associates coming and in and out of the halls that would house the conference.

Memories of that conference are hazy: there were pointless comings and goings, in and out of the conference halls or idly waiting in a corner for Father to end his long chats with people he knew and take me home. Urged by Father I attended some incomprehensible to me presentations in Nuclear Physics and Elementary Particle Physics, subjects at the frontier of physics research on which many Greek academics, conveniently detached from the Greek scientific and economic reality, devoted their efforts. Father saw it as a kind of baptism of fire for the hopeful and ambitious young man I was, with dreams and a drive to excel. Little sense did I make out of the talks, despite the intellectual effort I put in and a negligible effect did they have to enhance further my youthful predisposition to science. The latter was rather settled unwavering towards a career in science and engineering.

At the end of the week, from the generally pleasant mood and smiles of satisfaction and humor of Father, I surmised that first conference of the Greek Union of Physicists was crowned with success. First and foremost, Father had the opportunity to mingle with the few academic personalities and our national pillars in Physics he was acquainted with and respected. I sensed then how deep down he wished he had pursued an academic career in one of the branches of modern Physics, instead of the thankless, obscure and tedious quasi-engineering, mostly bureaucratic, role in a public telecom organization: to enjoy the prestige of a professorship some of his peers from university had already attained, the conferences and the expert speeches from the podium on pioneering research, in short, the lights of publicity the role of a university professor in Greece attracts.

In those days, tucked away deep in the cabinets of our bookcase, I discovered textbooks in physics and electrical engineering with the name of Father as the author. They were nothing more than typed lecture notes bound in a book, but the family name displayed in the cover of any sort of publication, such as those textbooks or even the conference program that caught the eye, I saw it as the crowning of some effort and dedication, as a piece of intellectual work that somehow withstands the passage of time. That generated a small dose of pride: I saw it as one of those infinitesimal contributions, notwithstanding the fact that they fast become obsolete and disappear under the weight of scientific progress.

My delving into physics continued with more zeal in the aftermath of the conference. Amongst several books, mainly university textbooks, Father had collected on physics, I discovered a relatively popularized version of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, which, however, included mathematics and a pre-required knowledge yet to acquire. I labored through its pages with effort, racking my brain, gasping from one equation to the next, struggling to understand the mental experiments supposedly proving expansion and contraction of time with speed, starting from the axiom that the speed of light was a universal constant, considered the maximum possible speed in nature. I realized huge gaps in my scientific knowledge, in mathematics and physics, despite my excellent record with my studies at school and of exam grades. Yet, I considered that laborious study, which only scratched the surface of an important theory, as a minor intellectual achievement, a small victory of the brain like when solving a difficult puzzle. Later in life I recorded as personal intellectual achievements of similar magnitude the completion of reading and understanding of some of the great scientific or philosophical works, the magnus opuses of human civilization, and noted the experience of the great satisfaction I derived from these endeavors.

With the encouragement and pocket money from Father, who, at least as far as book purchases were concerned, tended to ignore their impact on the family budget, I bought the five thick volumes of Berkeley’s Physics. It was a purchase that filled me with joy and boosted my confidence in my scientific future, especially when, after reading through the first pages of the first volume, that of classical Mechanics, I realized that I understood most of its content and walked through it without many setbacks and relative ease from one chapter to the next. The awareness that it was used as a textbook of one of the world's leading Universities was uplifting for a generally fragile confidence, and reassuring in terms of the limits of my cognitive abilities and the attainment of bright future in science. This youthful enthusiasm subsided somehow after I skipped several chapters and volumes to venture into the more advanced and exotic subjects of physics, which would have attracted any restless young scientist in the embryonic stages of one’s career: Quantum Mechanics, Nuclear Physics, Relativity, fascinating objects considered springboards of scientific prominence. It was the bitter realization of a novice of the many things he had yet to learn before he could be counted for in this arena!

It was also at the culmination of the conference and my first contact with modern theories, when lying on the floor amongst stacks of physics books, in a cloud of childish naivety, I tried to come up with ideas, conjectures and hypotheses, like Einstein and the great physicists of his ilk· to establish, in my illusion, a novel revolutionary theory: about the structure of matter or the beginning of the universe, which at some point would place me on the same pedestal with great scientists like Einstein, Heisenberg, Bohr, Planck, and others, whom I heard of and admired. My ambitions set new aims, scientific this time. It was just absurd childish dreaming, of course! I was quickly disappointed by fruitless attempts for a ‘new’ theory in physics, with the rudimentary, schoolboy knowledge I had: my scribblings ended up in the wastebasket. The road to scientific glory was long. I was by no means a prodigy and I realized again how much still was ahead of me to learn. Along with those thoughts and sketches of my so-called ‘theories’, my wanderings through the volumes of Berkeley's Physics were limited to chapters that corresponded to, supported and somewhat extended the curriculum and forthcoming exams material.

And those those ominous national exams were fast approaching and each passing day was weighing heavily in the revision schedule. Mother, ignorant of science, was overwhelmed by anxiety caused by a belief that my focus was diverting from the revision of core exam material and this might dent the prospect of achieving the major goal of every petty-bourgeois family: the admission of their offspring to the university, preferably in a respectable subject with sound professional career prospects, preferably in my hometown -the latter, for economic reason. The departments of physics or mathematics were not incorporated in the category of schools that would safeguard a prosperous future in Greece and considered second rate-choices for candidates. After exhausting every line, every equation and example from the chapters Berkeley’s Physics pertinent to the exam syllabus, the main points duly highlighted, I placed its volumes of on a shelf in the library -to Mother’s relief, with the covers of just the first two volumes (on Mechanics and Electricity & Magnetism) worn out, some of their contents underlined in red ink. Since then, rarely the need occurred to refer to the physics topics they addressed, but all five volumes traveled with me, in their scientific weight and value, wherever around the world I have been, to any house I happened to occupy. It became a legacy nostalgic reminder of another set of naïve and unfulfilled ambitions from an age of callowness as much as of an unbridled imagination.  

Friday, July 17, 2026

16 - Early Timid Literary Aspiration

 A great deal has been written since time immemorial about reading and studying and creating works literature, and the experiential relationship with this form of art. For many, literature became a focal point of their existence and their writings influenced the way of thinking and stance in life of others. What Stalin had precisely in mind when he said that writers and poets are ‘the engineers of the human soul’, but we do not need a Stalinist buzzword to remind me that reading works of literature profoundly affects soul and mind, generates and shapes emotions, forms thoughts, ideas, and articulates speech, the prerequisites to will and action, and the bond of man with the world. I realized early in life the emotional touch books could have on the soul, how my connection with literature shaped and matured the inner world of ideas, feeling and emotions, how it developed my perception of reality and enhanced self-awareness, helped me to formulate thoughts and ideas, and eventually gave rise to a need to express this inner world of mine with words and, when possible and applicable, with actions.

Literary works of Greek writers of the last century, virtually unknown outside the narrow confines of the Greek literary world and society, Papadiamantis, Karagatsis, Myrivilis, Venezis, Delta, Theotokas and others, whose works excerpts, however, had prominent places in school textbooks (as deemed suitable by the ministry for the ethno-religious edification of Greek children) and, later, Lountemis, Kazantzakis, Varnalis, Sotiriou, Alexiou, Hatzis, Tsirkas,  of Koumandareas, Themelis, Doukas, most of them of leftist inclinations and whose unconventional and progressive writing were banished from the mainstream ‘curriculum’ of my school years, books from both sets of authors adorned the family library. Reading short stories, novellas and novels in my native language was easy and enjoyable and I devoured our books one after another, the most intriguing amongst them in a single day, through incessant and marathon readings that often began in the quiet, lazy afternoons after lunch when others were enjoying their siestas, and ended at dusk in the dimmed skylight through my balcony door. No volume and weight, no number of pages in any book discouraged or intimidated me.

Father's collection of books unfortunately lacked works of poetry. That might be both cause and effect of a deficit in sensitivity and romanticism in his personality, characteristics of poetic souls, as far as I know, which Father neither inherited from his family environment, nor did he cultivate in his life. As I grew older, motivated mainly by the revolutionary music we listened to and the lyrics of songs we sang, I embarked in enriching our library with collections of poets like Ritsos, Varnalis, Seferis, Livaditis, Kavvadias, Embeirikos, Karyotakis, from the rich Greek heritage, and of Neruda, Lorca, Mayakovski and others from the progressive world poetry. Old-school established and mainstream poets, like Palamas, Solomos, Drosinis, Vizyinos, Kalvos and others, were studied and their poetry occasionally discussed in class, with indifference it must be said, while some of their poems were memorized from and recited in front of teachers and parents in national holidays.  

As is well known, that period of adolescence and early youth, a period of immaturity amongst other things, opens up in the mind a constantly renewed and expanding range of ambitions. The readings motivated me to try to write my own prose. And I did attempt to write, without any particular authenticity in form and creativity in the content, the harsh truth was, mostly imitating the style and idiomatic language used, in the natural or authentic forms developed by each seasoned writer I read. Those diverse style influenced my prose along the way and altering accordingly my style of writing, as I was reading one’s work with its individual authentic style, such as women get ideas for their outfit by flipping through fashion magazines. Timidly, but with furtive hopes of some recognition, I submitted to a national student competition a short non-fictional story competition story: about the neighborhood which was enveloping my childhood years, the taverna of Tsapatsaraina by the stream where common folk gathered on Saturday evening, the old low-house of my best friend’s grandparents, our plays in the alley, where construction of blocks of apartments was changing in a fast pace. All of this in rather melodramatic tones for the generations being lost in the passage of time. My short story did not stand out. As a participant, I received a small booklet with a selection of student short stories that received distinctions in the competition and my work I was longing to see printed was not amongst them. The disappointment was momentary and minimal, at a time when my core ambitions were shifting elsewhere. I managed to save a manuscript of that first (and last) short story for some self-criticism and improvements. I still had a life ahead of me for my literary forays and experiments -I thought, as an amateur and maybe professional writer. Thenceforth, my writing efforts were limited to essays, as parts of school assignments, and depending on the motivation, normally low as with most school work, and the topic we were called upon to address, I regularly won praise –however, insignificant to resurrect my literary ambitions and spread my wings to that direction. The respective philologist, after grading our essays, usually invited me to recite my work in front of an indifferent and noisy class. Despite the shyness that I possessed by each time a teacher invited me to stand in front of the blackboard, in those early class environments, I used to overcome my bashfulness and managed fast-talking, with a relatively steady albeit flat-pitch voice, to articulate my short theses. But the national exams for university admission and the grades the most prestigious subjects like medicine, law or engineering required was were approaching and those ‘extracurricular activities’ like story writing had to be drastically curtailed. My study and performance in maths and science were given absolute priority in the allocation of time.

Towards the end of last year of Lyceum, that would conclude the last stage of our mandatory education, the progressive philologist of the year, Mrs. B, a petite figure with the kind and refined manners I mentioned above, assigned us a review of the works of writer of our choice. I chose Dimitris Hadjis, a communist writer and political refugee of the diaspora, sentenced to death by the post-civil war courts, and spent his life, until the transition to democracy in 1974, behind the Iron-Curtain, in Budapest. His short stories and novels -The Double Book, The End of Our Small Town, and others, I had read with interest and I was inspired by his linguistic style. I devoted plenty of time at the expense of few leisurely activities I was afforded, and with commendable drive and passion I wrote a multi-page essay with a synthesis and the exhibition of ideas that I found interesting in his novels. With the remarkable volume of books read on my own accord and initiative I felt that I had acquainted myself with a wide spectrum of modern Greek literature. I was pleased with the concisely, if not over-long, written essay I came up with, and my critique of a favorite author and I expected what I thought was a mature exposition of Hadji's works would impress Mrs. B, and maybe a handful of half-interested students, as much as it had impressed Father when he leafed through it. Unfortunately, under the circumstances in the public school for common people I attended, the presentation ended in a fiasco -as described above, nulling the little value I had attached to it. That presentation marked the limit of my lonely journeys in serial reading works of modern Greek literature and the end of my first timid attempts to write. The last traces of ambition to become an author were erased as well, although a small open crack in the depths of mind allowed some light through to shine through and show me that path I had abandoned, but at an older age, certainly too late for any career of note as a writer. If once I possessed a little bit of creativity the art of writing requires, that diminishes with time until it dries up in later year. Barely time was left to unimaginatively and uninspiringly salvage some of those memories.

The avid reading of books, having become an integral part of a ripening youth, turned into other directions. A career was discouraged along one of the so-called ‘humanities’ paths from early on: for a ‘positive’ mind, as mine was labelled, only a direction in scientific or engineering discipline, encompassing mathematics and physics in its core (subjects which occupied Father’s academic and professional life, as he proudly proclaimed at each opportunity) would highlight the limited range of talents I possessed and make the most of my potential. Besides, such disciplines were more tailored to the male brain and mental inclinations according to the stereotypes of the time. The ‘humanities’ were not for the highly intelligent, I was told, and intelligence, always according to Father's preoccupations, was almost exclusively associated with the ability to negotiate and solve complex mathematical problems or logic puzzles. Early literary wanderings served only to formulate one’s language, develop written and oral skills, and, importantly, obtain a good grade in the cumbersome essays we were asked to come up with in real-time -in those thorny sessions of the national exams. No one questioned the importance of language, but cultivating language skills were driven as means achieve specific goals, rather than an end to a professional engagement in literature, journalism, historiography, etc. On the other hand, studies in Mathematics and Physics as levers to success in national exams, aiming at prosperous career in engineering, subjects cold and barren relying on the use of logic, deprived me of aesthetic and emotional stimuli, stifled the imagination, made me a less sensitive, poetic and romantic and lyrical human being, and, perhaps, rather excessively practical. The opportunity for a golden mean, the equanimity and balance from a state of mental equilibrium, to borrow a term from physics, was sadly lost during those school years.

Nietzsche’s famous quote is brought in mind: ‘Art and art again. We need art so that we do not to die from the truth.’ It took more than half a lifetime to appreciate this message. My early literary ambitions were crushed in their cradle, along with a few others in as much an embryonic stage, the pursuing of which could have aided in the development of a better-rounded personality. Instead, this development has been permeated from an early age with the aim of pursuing an ambiguous ‘success’ in a professional career amongst a handful of options. This imperative and demand the lower middle class in Greece place on itself and its offspring (for self-preservation and advancement in the social ladder) was often met at the expense of the soul and spirit.

Sunday, July 5, 2026

15 - Reading for Ever

Since I remember, I have been surrounded by books, a lot of books· books numbered in the hundreds and thousands, lined up on dozens of rows of shelve· books Father inherited from his uncle or bought in his youth and continued collecting for the rest of his life. As a child I counted them, sorted and arranged them, leafed through each one, I read most. Later, I used to sign by hand or stamp with my name everything I bought or thought it belonged to me. With pocket money I started creating an own sizeable as much as cherished collection. I read a lot of them continuously, systematically: underlining the main ideas and points the author touched upon, making notes in margins and notebooks. I did not merely read, but I studied them: in breadth and depth, with the peculiar personalised system and styles of study I developed along the way, as it felt more suited to my cognitive and perceptual abilities and idiosyncrasy, and more conducive in accumulating knowledge and making its comprehension effective. The frequency and intensity of reading books and the dedication to studying them remained undiminished from early childhood through the present day and it will continue so for as long as I retain my faculties and until the death of the human spirit in me. For the environment I grew up in, the opportunity I was given as a child and young man -to be immersed in a plethora of books and volume of knowledge they render accessible, I feel fortunate and grateful to my parents for providing the initial spark.

Father, the de facto family spokesman, often praised and congratulated himself in front of friends, colleagues and acquaintances as the charismatic educator, who taught me how to read well before I turned four. All started, he was saying, by asking me to read the names of boats in the port of Hydra in our summer holidays when I turned or the sign board of the shops of Thessaloniki at four. Deep dives from early age into books made reading them addictive. An avid reader, a "bookworm", Ι was devouring books at a rate that has been maintained unabated throughout life and occasionally accelerated by the positive feedback to the spirit a conductive study environment and ambience can provide. With an infinite world of knowledge stretching out before me, I branched out my studying endeavours to new subjects and authors and a diverse spectrum of sources: just as a tree grows –the ever growing ‘tree of knowledge’ in this case, from a sapling quickly grows taller and wider, sprouts branches and expands in many directions. From the first years of school until today, at a more or less undiminished pace, hundreds, perhaps thousands of books passed through and worn out by my hands· books in which I always deliberately left the markings of the meticulous and avid reader: the underlining, the notes in the margins, folded pages, the gray-black or oiled fingerprints, my name and signature above the completion date in the top corner of one of the first pages, later stamps with my name. (As soon as I finished school, I hastened to obtain an ink stamp and pad, along with a deck of business cards, as a kind of self-affirmation of the scholar and scientist, yet unrealisable, invisible to and unacknowledged from the outside world). Everything I underlined or noted in these books I believed and still do, rather foolishly, would be traces left for posterity and evidence that an undersigned existence honoured with time and intellectual effort, a not insignificant period of his life, a particular work and its author. And at those early stages in life, I used to read most genres of written work without a particular inclination: literary novels and short stories, classical or modern, philosophical essays, current political analyses, art critiques, scientific articles and books, and so on.

I am compelled to reaffirm some truisms on the subject of reading, because it occupies a significant part in the lives of devout readers, the ‘bookworms’ as they say, like me. The epigrammatic metaphor of Uberto Eco, that reading books allows us to experience through the power of imagination other lives and existences, fictional or not, outside our own, would suffice to justify the endless hours spent in bending over books -as far as I am concerned. Indeed, reading, especially novels and stories, transported me each time to different places and eras, societies and the souls of human being, as articulated formed by the author. The characters in them, their actions and passions on occasions stirred me. Throughout their stories I found my own feelings fluctuate in tandem between joy and sadness, I smiled or my eyes were misted over whilst tuning into the feelings of their heroes, I exercised empathy. Several times I identified with parts of their lives and thoughts and ideas, I reflect parts of my life and existence behind words and sayings, thoughts and actions. The emotions from the actions and thoughts and the psychology of the heroes of a novel, as they spring from the pages, are reflected and re-enlivened in the mind, extrapolated by imagination, often stirring emotions and bringing a smile or tears in the eyes. The latter, in particular, is often affected– for reasons that I have not been able to fully explain other than an inherent sensitivity to real or fictitious human drama, by the approach to the last lines of a book narrative and the end of the human story it tells. It is the same range of emotions, of melancholy and sadness, that often affect us when we feel that a chapter of real life is reaching its conclusion: a relationship, a change of house and neighborhood, a long period of working with the same group colleagues in the same place, a child who grows up and leaves home, the death of a person who was a part of our lives. There is a natural explanation to this: each ending reminds us of the passage of time, a past without return to it, a step closer to the very end.

The equally significant scientific and philosophical readings do not produce the emotional effects with literature. In a sense dry and impersonal, academic and analytical, they aim exclusively at the transfer of knowledge, whilst they empower logical thinking and judgement. No doubt they open our eyes and minds outwards, into the material world that surrounds us, as well as inwards, to the depths of our own selves, to self-awareness and conscience. All this knowledge, all the theories and systems of ideas we acquaint ourselves with and before we adopt some of them, eventually become integral part of our lives, they expand it to hitherto unexplored dimensions, guide us in our present and future existence, enhance the meaning of our past, and sometimes, perhaps subconsciously, shape the uncanny world of emotions within.

After all we have been afforded by nature a unique opportunity of an infinitesimal in time and space existence in this world, within this mind-blowing universe, as well as a miraculous brain and the consciousness to perceive life and this existence, to give it some direction in its finite journey and to express ourselves with words and actions. It would be a tragic omission and a great loss in its value if we do not to strive to understand this existence in this world to the maximum possible extent.

Monday, June 22, 2026

14 - Where is the Road Leading to?

Most of us grew up in increasingly competitive capitalistic class-societies, immersed ourselves and became cogs of its operations, as the only means to survive and live in the best possible way. Prospect of a radical qualitative transformation of this socioeconomic system into something else, despite the utopian goals and struggles of our youth, proved non-existent. How good a life one has can be assessed either subjectively or objectively, on the basis of societal and economic norms. Congenital biological attributes, along with acquired skills and education, the social class we are born in, are some the parameters that potentially shape our course in life. Of course, at the end of this journey, ‘success’ and a life’s worth, regardless of how this is assessed and determined can be function of myriads of factors, circumstances and situations, many exogenous, outside our control or influence, others unpredictable or unforeseeable, despite our tendency and efforts to plan and predict with some clarity the future ahead. Before one set out to recount and analyse the factors that have contributed to isolated ‘successes’ or ‘failures’, and a cumulative qualitative evaluation, one must first, both as a judge and the subject of judgment, understand and define ‘success’ and the yardsticks in the evaluation. That is, with a reference always to the spatiotemporal, one needs to understand and define what fundamentally constitutes ‘success’ in life. Is it accumulated material wealth? Is it material and intellectual output and the legacy (or the traces and their longevity of these traces one leaves behind)? Is it a recognition by fellow human beings, in a community or a nation or internationally, horizontally in society or vertically, through one’s field of occupation and expertise in an incessantly progressive division of labour in modern societies, which diffuses and reduces the contribution of each one into the intellectual and material production of society to the infinitesimal.

The question of how successful one’s life and what is its worth has been, is a complex question. One that we normally ask ourselves towards the end, when we take account of the value of a course that is approaching its end. What for most of is a purely subjective evaluation a lot have been said and written, perhaps disproportionately much given the importance of such an undertaking for common mortals. We are not the ones, after all, who could judge our own success, and not many outsiders could do that. In fact, few are interested in those sorts of judgements and evaluations of their lives and those of the common folk they were associated with, during the lifetimes.

But I am reaching a point in time and in my writings where the issue of how good and ‘successful’ and ‘meaningful’ a life concerns and weighs on me, and begs for answers at least with reference to universal criteria and the metrics that society I belong to uses as norms. It is of my own exclusive concern; it is for the sole purpose of resting the consciousness: an a posteriori evaluation of existence has no particular importance, rather no importance outside of oneself. In any case, ‘the way of life’ we chose or guided to embark on, ‘success’ and ‘recognition’ are of existential concern. They are exclusively posited as existential queries from the individual to the individual. While questions of ‘success’ and ‘value’ and ‘worth’, along with the innate want for recognition (Camus wrote: ‘All consciousness is basically the desire to be recognised and proclaimed as such by other consciousnesses’) hover in our minds throughout existence, often torturously, as elements of the broader philosophical question of whether ‘the whole lot’ ha been worth the toil or the more prosaic: ‘What do I aim at? What do I want to achieve? What have I have achieved?’ Death wipes off those question marks, along with the occasional timid, certainly unsatisfactory, and sometimes uncomfortable answers we gave on occasions to ourselves; which, by concluding the vicious cycles of brooding about ‘success’ and ‘achievement’, ultimately, the search for and, maybe, the revelation of a ‘meaning’, makes me wonder whether there is any point of positing such questions and vainly searching for ultimately inconsequential answers.

Yet, I ask this question to myself, hysteron-proteron and by the way in the narrative whilst discussing the dreams and ambitions of a now distant youth, being now at a stage of life devoid of major aims and ambitions for a rapidly shrinking future. Young people, however, as I wrote above, with a few exceptions, set and nurture ambitions, grandiose or modest, along with an ambiguous want of a better life with future prospects, with the ambitions and aims of previous generations, of the grandparents and parents, of friends and colleagues, along with a given level of social advancement, as benchmarks. And their minds design an equally vague ‘success’, as again is guided by the norms of their milieu, and with respect to recognized, valued and distinguished in various domains of social activity.

It was Father who, in one of our recent discussions of ‘success’ in life, that a successful man is one who has achieved the goals and largely fulfilled the ambitions he set out (or others set out for him) when young. I could not agree. I considered such statement contradictory and arbitrary (another one of his unsubstantiated sweeping statements amongst many he used to utter from time to time), as it raises more questions than supposedly having tried to answer –as if such a question could be answered tentatively or answered at all. The world around us changes at a pace and in directions, impossible to imagine and project when we were young; ourselves in it, living and acting, are unconsciously carried away by the river of social and technological evolution. Growing up in this fast-moving world requires effort to grasp these changes along the way and adapt accordingly. Adaptability is clearly a condition of basic survival, let alone of ‘success’, prosperity and distinction. In my case, family and especially the constrained and rather insular environments of Greek society, that is, the circles in which I grew up and with which I interacted, created and established a system of norms and institutions, pointing to relatively rigid goals from an early age, against the back drop of the conservative social reality of my place and time. The establishment of a system of goals and ambitions for young people can again be attributed, as written, to its inherently competitive nature of a class society, even if, in the case of Greece, is somehow distorted when compared with more advanced economies. Such competition encompasses most aspects of social activity; and the more developed a capitalist society is, the more intense it appears, and the higher the demands it places on the individual, as I found out later in life. This, however, opens another topic of discussion.

Perhaps, then, to survive and stay afloat and advance in the journey of life, to manage and close its various chapters, as pointed out by our established social norms, the time and geography, that is chapters in education, love, family, work, to accumulate knowledge and experience, without touching peaks of the material wealth and fame – the reach of a few, is an achievement of a kind in this brutal human arena. And concluding all those chapters, without paying much heed to the richness of the content, can be considered as an accomplishment per se and provide, when reminiscing about them, a satisfactory answer to the call of conscience about the meaning of life towards the end, of how ‘good’ or ‘successful’ or ‘worthwhile’ that life has been.

20 - An Insipid Prize

Kazantzis whose entire professional life was devoted to teaching maths with remarkable intensity and passion, inspired me more with the inge...